najoNanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, MathematicsНаносистемы: физика, химия, математика2220-80542305-7971Университет ИТМОnajo-1269Research ArticleMATHEMATICSМАТЕМАТИКАMulti particle states calculations and particles storage in perturbed nanolayersPopovS. I.

 49 Kronverkskiy, Saint Petersburg, 197101

popov1955@gmail.comSaint Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and OpticsRussian Federation20132208202542173181Copyright © Popov S.I., 20252025Popov S.I.Popov S.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://nanojournal.ifmo.ru/jour/article/view/1269

The problem of particle storage in nanolayered structures will be considered. Local perturbations of nanolayers can lead to the appearanceof eigenvalues of the corresponding one-particle Hamiltonian. To study particle storage it is necessary to deal with the multi-particle problem. This problem faces essential computational difficulties due to the great increase of the spatial dimension. Using a composite of natural physical models, analytical methods and computational approaches allows one to simplify the problem and to obtain useful results for application. Particularly, the Hartree method and Finite Elements Method (FEM) are used. The discrete spectrum of the Hamiltonian for two interacting particles is considered. Two different types of perturbation are considered: deformation of the layer boundary and a small window in a wall between two layers. The relation between the system parameters (interaction intensity- waveguide deformation) ensuring the existence of a non-empty discrete spectrum is studied. A comparison of particle storage efficiencies is made for these two cases.

discrete spectrumfew-particle problemquantum waveguideThe work was supported by Federal Targeted Program “Scientific and Educational Human Resources for Innovation-Driven Russia” (contracts P689 NK-526P, 14.740.11.0879, 16.740.11.0030), grant 11-08-00267 of Russian Foundation for Basic Researches.ReferencesGavrilov M., Gortinskaya L., Pestov A., Popov I. and Tesovskaya E. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett., 4(2), P. 137 (2007).Gavrilov M., Gortinskaya L., Pestov A., Popov I. and Tesovskaya E. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett., 4(2), P. 137 (2007).Pavlov B.S., Popov I.Yu., Geyler V.A. and Pershenko O.S. Europhys. Lett., 52(2), P. 196 (2000).Pavlov B.S., Popov I.Yu., Geyler V.A. and Pershenko O.S. Europhys. Lett., 52(2), P. 196 (2000).Roemer R.A. and Raikh M.E. Phys. Rev.B, 62(11), P. 7045 (2000).Roemer R.A. and Raikh M.E. Phys. Rev.B, 62(11), P. 7045 (2000).Shepelyansky D.L. Phys. Rev. Lett., 73(19), P. 2607 (1994).Shepelyansky D.L. Phys. Rev. Lett., 73(19), P. 2607 (1994).Sutherland B. Beautiful Models. 70 Years of Exactly Solved Quantum Many-body Problems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).Sutherland B. Beautiful Models. 70 Years of Exactly Solved Quantum Many-body Problems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).Shen J.-T. and Fan Sh. New J. Phys., 11, P. 113024 (2009).Shen J.-T. and Fan Sh. New J. Phys., 11, P. 113024 (2009).Langmann G., Laptev A. and Paufler C. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39, P. 1057 (2006).Langmann G., Laptev A. and Paufler C. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39, P. 1057 (2006).Buslaev V.S., Levin S.B., Neittaanmaki P. and Ojala T. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43, P. 285205 (2010).Buslaev V.S., Levin S.B., Neittaanmaki P. and Ojala T. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43, P. 285205 (2010).Nogami Y., Toyama F.M. and Varshni Y.P. Phys. Lett. A, 207, P. 355 (1995).Nogami Y., Toyama F.M. and Varshni Y.P. Phys. Lett. A, 207, P. 355 (1995).Exner P. and Vugalter S.A. J. Math. Phys., 40(10), P. 4630 (1999).Exner P. and Vugalter S.A. J. Math. Phys., 40(10), P. 4630 (1999).Exner P. and Zagrebnov V.A. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38, P. L463 (2005).Exner P. and Zagrebnov V.A. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38, P. L463 (2005).Linde H. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39, P. 5105 (2006).Linde H. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39, P. 5105 (2006).Newton R.G. J. Operator Theory, 10, P. 119 (1983).Newton R.G. J. Operator Theory, 10, P. 119 (1983).Klaus M. Annals Phys., 108(2), P. 288 (1977).Klaus M. Annals Phys., 108(2), P. 288 (1977).Seto N. Publ. RIMS, 9, P. 429 (1974).Seto N. Publ. RIMS, 9, P. 429 (1974).Popov I.Yu. J. Math. Phys., 33(5), P. 1685 (1992).Popov I.Yu. J. Math. Phys., 33(5), P. 1685 (1992).Popov I.Yu. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 118(3), P. 555 (1995).Popov I.Yu. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 118(3), P. 555 (1995).Lobanov I.S., Lotoreichik V.Yu. and Popov I.Yu. Theor. Math. Phys., 162(3), P. 397 (2010).Lobanov I.S., Lotoreichik V.Yu. and Popov I.Yu. Theor. Math. Phys., 162(3), P. 397 (2010).Exner P. and Vugalter S.A. Lett. Math. Phys., 39(1), P. 59 (1997).Exner P. and Vugalter S.A. Lett. Math. Phys., 39(1), P. 59 (1997).Duclos P. and Exner P. Rev. Math. Phys., 7, P. 73 (1995).Duclos P. and Exner P. Rev. Math. Phys., 7, P. 73 (1995).Bulla W., Gesztesy F., Renger W. and Simon B. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 125, P. 1487 (1997).Bulla W., Gesztesy F., Renger W. and Simon B. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 125, P. 1487 (1997).Okopinska A. J. Phys.: Conf. Series, 213(1), P. 012004 (2010).Okopinska A. J. Phys.: Conf. Series, 213(1), P. 012004 (2010).Block I., Dalibard J. and Zwerger W. Rev. Mod. Phys., 80(3), P. 885 (2008).Block I., Dalibard J. and Zwerger W. Rev. Mod. Phys., 80(3), P. 885 (2008).Cornean H., Duclos P. and Ricaud B. Few-Body Systems, 38(2-4), P. 125 (2006).Cornean H., Duclos P. and Ricaud B. Few-Body Systems, 38(2-4), P. 125 (2006).Exner P. and Vugalter S., Ann. I.H.P. Phys. Theor., 65, P. 109–123 (1996).Exner P. and Vugalter S., Ann. I.H.P. Phys. Theor., 65, P. 109–123 (1996).Popov I.Yu. Appl. Math. Lett., 14, P. 109–113 (2001).Popov I.Yu. Appl. Math. Lett., 14, P. 109–113 (2001).Popov I.Yu. J.Math.Phys., 43(1), P. 215–234 (2002)Popov I.Yu. J.Math.Phys., 43(1), P. 215–234 (2002)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.