Experimental investigation of quenching behavior of heated zircaloy rod in accidental condition of nuclear reactor with water and water based nanofluids
https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2016-7-3-528-533
Abstract
The physical phenomena of rewetting and quenching are of prime importance in nuclear reactor safety in the event of Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA). In such a case, the fuel pins become dry hot. Under this condition, cold water is injected from emergency core cooling system (ECCS). The quenching behavior of such heated rod bundle (re-flood heat transfer behavior) is quite complex. It is well known that Nanofluids have better heat removal capability and a high heat transfer coefficient owing to their enhanced thermal properties. Recent investigations have shown that the addition of the Al2O3 nanoparticles result in better cooling capabilities as compared to the traditionally used quenching media. In this context, the authors have carried out experiments on quenching behavior of hot zircalloy tube with water and nanofluids as stated above. Quenching of the tube was observed to occur within few seconds in both the cases in the presence of decay heat. It was also observed that the nanofluids showed slightly reduced quenching time as compared to water.
About the Authors
A. S. ChincholeIndia
Trombay Mumbai 400085
P. P. Kulkarni
India
Trombay Mumbai 400085
A. K. Nayak
India
Trombay Mumbai 400085
References
1. Das S.K., Choi S.U.S., Yu W., Pradeep T. Nanofluids: Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2008.
2. Kim H., Kim J., Kim M. Experimental study on CHF characteristics of DM water-TiO2 nano-fluids. Nuclear engineering and technology, 2006, 38 (1), P. 61–68.
3. Kim H., DeWitt G., et al. On the quenching of steel and zircaloy spheres in DM water-based nanofluids with alumina, silica and diamond nanoparticles. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2009, 35, P. 427–438.
4. Kim H., Buongiorno J., Hu L., McKrell T. Nanoparticle deposition effects on the minimum heat flux point and quench front speed during quenching in DM water-based alumina nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 53, P. 1542–1553.
5. Buongiorno J. et al. A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Journal of Applied Physics, 2009, 106, P. 094312 (14 p.).
6. Ciloglu D., Bolukbasi A., Comakli K. Effect of Nanofluids on the Saturated Pool Film Boiling. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2012, 6, P. 7–29.
7. Park H.S., Shiferaw D.,et al. Film boiling heat transfer on a high temperature sphere in nanofluid. Proceedings of 2004 ASME Heat Transfer/Fluids Engineering Summer Conference, 2004, P. 1–8NC.
8. Das S.K., Putra N., Thiesen P., Roetzel W. Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids. Journal of Heat Transfer – Transactions of the ASME, 2003, 125, P. 567–574.
9. Nayak A.K., Kulkarni P.P., Chinchole A.S. Experimental Investigation on Pool Boiling Critical Heat Flux with Nanofluids. Journal of Nanofluids, 2015, 4, P. 140–146.
Review
For citations:
Chinchole A.S., Kulkarni P.P., Nayak A.K. Experimental investigation of quenching behavior of heated zircaloy rod in accidental condition of nuclear reactor with water and water based nanofluids. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics. 2016;7(3):528-533. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2016-7-3-528-533