Preview

Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics

Advanced search

Composite membranes based on geometrically constrained PIM-1 for dehumidification of gas mixtures

https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2019-10-3-282-288

Abstract

Composite membranes based on polymer with intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) confined in the pores of porous anodic alumina (AAO) supports were prepared by spin-coating method under vacuum suction. Water permeance of the membranes was measured at humidities ranging from 10 to 70 %. High permeance towards water vapors reaching the value of ∼ 13700 l/(m2 ·bar·h) coupled with the H2O/N2 selectivity of 1400 was observed at the humidity of 70 % for composite membranes due to the condensation in nanopores of polymer and anodic alumina channels. The obtained selectivity exceeds strongly that of bulk PIM-1 due to confinement of polymer chains mobility in AAO channels. The water vapor sorption capacity for composite membranes exceeds 7 % being governed both by condensation in polymer micropores and anodic alumina channels. Physical ageing of the membranes was monitored for a period of 6 months and then the membranes were subjected to activation in methanol. It was established that physical ageing substantially reduces the water permeance but activation in methanol allows one to partially rejuvenate water transport performance.

About the Authors

E. A. Chernova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991



I. V. Roslyakov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991



S. G. Dorofeev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991



A. V. Lukashin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Yang B., Weixing Y., Gao F., Guo B. A review of membrane-based air dehumidification. Indoor and Built Environment, 2013, 24 (1), P. 11–26.

2. Baker R.W., Low B.T. Gas separation membrane materials: A perspective. Macromolecules, 2014, 47 (20), P. 6999–7013.

3. Sadilov I.S., Petukhov D.I., Eliseev A.A. Enhancing gas separation efficiency by surface functionalization of nanoporous membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 221, P. 74–82.

4. Scholes C.A., Jin J., Stevens G.W., Kentish S.E. Competitive permeation of gas and water vapour in high free volume polymeric membranes. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 2015, 53 (10), P. 719–728.

5. Uchytil P., Petrickovic R., Seidel-Morgenstern A. Study of capillary condensation of butane in a Vycor glass membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 64 (1–2), P. 27–36.

6. Lira H. de L., Paterson R. New and modified anodic alumina membranes: Part III. Preparation and characterisation by gas diffusion of 5 nm pore size anodic alumina membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 206 (1–2), P. 375–387.

7. Petukhov D.I., Berekchiian M.V., Eliseev A.A. Meniscus Curvature Effect on the Asymmetric Mass Transport through Nanochannels in Capillary Condensation Regime. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122 (51), P. 29537–29548.

8. Petukhov D.I., Chernova E.A., et al. Thin graphene oxide membranes for gas dehumidification. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 577, P. 184–194.

9. Eliseev An.A., Poyarkov A.A., et al. Operando study of water vapor transport through ultra-thin graphene oxide membranes. 2D Materials, 2019, 6 (3), 035039.

10. Bolto B., Hoang M., Xie Z. A review of water recovery by vapour permeation through membranes. Water Research, 2012, 46 (2), P. 259–266.

11. Metz S.J., van De Ven W.J.C., et al. Transport of water vapor and inert gas mixtures through highly selective and highly permeable polymer membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 251 (1–2), P. 29–41.

12. Shengzhou L., Feng W., Tianlu C. Synthesis of Poly(ether ether ketone)s with High Content of Sodium Sulfonate Groups as Gas Dehumidification Membrane Materials. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2001, 22 (8), P. 579–582.

13. Chernova E.A., Bermeshev M.A., et al. The effect of geometric confinement on gas separation characteristics of additive poly[3- (trimethylsilyl)tricyclononene-7]. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, 2018, 9 (2), P. 252–258.

14. Chernova E., Petukhov D., et al. Enhanced gas separation factors of microporous polymer constrained in the channels of anodic alumina membranes. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, P. 31183.

15. Petukhov D.I., Napolskii K.S., et al. Comparative study of structure and permeability of porous oxide films on aluminum obtained by singleand two-step anodization. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2013, 5

16. (16), P. 7819–7824. [16] Petukhov D.I., Napolskii K.S., Eliseev A.A. Permeability of anodic alumina membranes with branched channels. Nanotechnology, 2012, 23 (33), P. 335601.

17. Petukhov D.I., Buldakov D.A., et al. Liquid permeation and chemical stability of anodic alumina membranes. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2017, 8, P. 561–570.

18. Stull D.R. Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances. Organic and Inorganic Compounds. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1947, 39 (4), P. 517– 540.

19. Petukhov D.I., Berekchiian M.V., et al. Experimental and Theoretical Study of Enhanced Vapor Transport through Nanochannels of Anodic Alumina Membranes in a Capillary Condensation Regime. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120 (20), P. 10982–10990.

20. Petukhov D.I., Eliseev A.A. Gas permeation through nanoporous membranes in the transitional flow region. Nanotechnology, 2016, 27 (8), P. 85707.

21. Roslyakov I.V., Napolskii K.S., et al. Thermal properties of anodic alumina membranes. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, 2013, 4 (1), P. 120–129.

22. Emmler T., Heinrich K., et al. Free Volume Investigation of Polymers of Intrinsic Microporosity (PIMs): PIM-1 and PIM1 Copolymers Incorporating Ethanoanthracene Units. Macromolecules, 2010, 43 (14), P. 6075–6084.

23. Shantarovich V.P., Suzuki T., et al. Structural heterogeneity in glassy polymeric materials revealed by positron annihilation and other supplementary techniques. Physica status solidi, 2007, 4 (10), P. 3776–3779.

24. Chaukura N. Interaction of a Polymer of Intrinsic Microporosity (PIM-1) with Penetrants. American Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2015, 3 (3), P. 139.

25. Yampolskii Y., Alentiev A., et al. Intermolecular Interactions: New Way to Govern Transport Properties of Membrane Materials. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49 (23), P. 12031–12037.

26. Lasseuguette E., Ferrari M.-C., Brandani S. Humidity Impact on the Gas Permeability of PIM-1 Membrane for Post-combustion Application. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63, P. 194–201.


Review

For citations:


Chernova E.A., Roslyakov I.V., Dorofeev S.G., Lukashin A.V. Composite membranes based on geometrically constrained PIM-1 for dehumidification of gas mixtures. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics. 2019;10(3):282-288. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2019-10-3-282-288

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-8054 (Print)
ISSN 2305-7971 (Online)