An interpretation of the strongest X-ray diffraction peak for various carbon nanoclusters
https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2016-7-2-340-348
Abstract
The most intensive X-ray diffraction peaks for three types of carbon allotropes are analyzed: i) temperature-annealed nanodiamond powder (carbon “onions”), ii) multi-walled carbon nanotubes, iii) layers of epitaxial graphene. A reconstruction of the X-ray diffraction pattern using an intershell distribution, obtained by high resolution transmission electron microscopy, was compared to the XRD data. For a qualitative analysis of the diffraction profiles, the method of convolution of Lorentzians (size broadening profile), together with a statistical consideration of interlayer spacings (lattice strain broadening profile) were used. For the case of iii) the statistical distribution reduces to a Gaussian and the method itself transforms to a best fit procedure of the classical Voigt function to the experimental data. For cases i) and ii) and the high-resolution electron microscopy-reconstructed data, the method fits the experiment better using either negatively or positively-skewed statistical distributions, correspondingly. A model of particles with a spiral internal structure and with radius-dependent spacings between the successive turns may explain experimental data for these cases. The data for epitaxial graphene allows different interpretations, including fluctuations of lattice spacings caused by distortions of the valence bands and angles in the graphene planes or by the formation of scrolls.
About the Authors
A. V. SiklitskayaPoland
Warsaw
S. G. Yastrebov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
R. Smith
United Kingdom
Loughborough
References
1. Mykhaylyk O. O., Solonin Y. M., Batchelder D. N. et al. Transformation of nanodiamond into carbon onions: A comparative study by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, electron energy-loss spectroscopy, x-ray diffraction, small-angle X-ray scattering, and ultraviolet Raman spectroscopy. Appl. Phys., 2005, 97, 074302, 16 pp.
2. Shah N. A., Abbas M., Amin M. et al. Design and analysis of functional multiwalled carbon nanotubes for infrared sensors. Sensor Actuat A-Phys., 2013, 203, P. 142–148.
3. Banhart F., Ajayan P. M. Carbon onions as nanoscopic pressure cells for diamond formation. Nature, 1996, 382, P. 433–435.
4. Tokarczyk M., Kowalski G., Kepa H. et al. Multilayer graphene stacks grown by different methods-thickness measurements by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and optical transmission. Crystallogr. Reports, 2013, 58(7), P. 1053–1057.
5. Ma J. Stone-Wales defects in graphene and other planar sp2-bonded materials. Phys. Rev.B, 2009, 80, 033407, 4 pp.
6. Langford J. L, Delhez R., de Keijser Th., et al. Profile Analysis for Microcrystalline Properties by the Fourier and Other Methods. Aust. J. Phys., 1988, 41, P. 173–181.
7. Ozawa M., Goto H., Kusunoki M. Continuously Growing Spiral Carbon Nanoparticles as the Intermediates in the Formation of Fullerenes and Nanoonions. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, P. 7135–7138.
8. Zilong Liu Z., Qingzhong X., Tao Ye. Carbon nanoscroll from C4H/C4F-type graphene superlattice: MD and MM simulation insights. Phys. Chem. Chemi. Physics, 2015, 17(5), P. 3441–3450.
Review
For citations:
Siklitskaya A.V., Yastrebov S.G., Smith R. An interpretation of the strongest X-ray diffraction peak for various carbon nanoclusters. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics. 2016;7(2):340-348. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2016-7-2-340-348