Impact of nano-sized cerium oxide on physico-mechanical characteristics and thermal properties of the bacterial cellulose films
https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2018-9-6-754-762
Abstract
A set of nanocomposite film materials based on bacterial cellulose containing nanoparticles of cerium dioxide was prepared. An investigation into the structural and morphological characteristics of the films has been performed, their thermal, mechanical and tribological properties were determined. A protocol of the nanocomposite materials formation used in the work was shown to provide a homogeneous distribution of ceria nanoparticles in the matrix polymer volume in addition to the presence of certain amount of broadly size-dispersed cerium oxide aggregates in the bulk film. The increase of nanoparticles concentration in the composite provokes a progressive growth of the Young’s modulus and strength of the film material. Introduction of nanoparticles into the polymer causes the stabilization of sliding friction processes in the tribocontact with steel as well as the decrease of intensity in the wear rate of the film. An increase of the nanoparticles concentration results in a decrease of the material thermal stability.
Keywords
polymer-inorganic nanocomposites,
bacterial cellulose,
ceria,
electron microscopy,
mechanical properties,
thermal stability,
tribologic properties
Supporting agencies: The work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 18-13-00305).
About the Authors
I. V. Gofman
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
199004, Bolshoi prospect 31, Saint Petersburg
A. L. Nikolaeva
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
199004, Bolshoi prospect 31, Saint Petersburg
A. K. Khripunov
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
199004, Bolshoi prospect 31, Saint Petersburg
A. V. Yakimansky
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences; Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Chemistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
199004, Bolshoi prospect 31, Saint Petersburg
198504, Universitetskii prospect 26, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg
E. M. Ivan’kova
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
199004, Bolshoi prospect 31, Saint Petersburg
D. P. Romanov
Institute of Silicate Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
199034, Adm. Makarova emb., 2, Saint Petersburg
O. S. Ivanova
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
119991, Leninsky prospect 31, Moscow
M. A. Teplonogova
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
119991, Leninsky prospect 31, Moscow
V. K. Ivanov
Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
119991, Leninsky prospect 31, Moscow
References
1. Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials. Ed. O.J. Rojas. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016.
2. Esa F., Tasirin S.M., Rahman N.A. Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2014, 2, P. 113–119.
3. Mitrofanov R.Y., Budaeva V.V., Sakovich G.V. Preparation and Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Gel Films. Chemistry for Sustainable Development, 2010, 18, P. 503–508.
4. Gromovykh T.I., Sadykova V.S., et al. Bacterial cellulose synthesized by Gluconacetobacter hansenii for medical applications. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 2017, 53, P. 60–67.
5. Backdahl H., Helenius G., et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials, 2006, 27, P. 2141–2149.
6. Feng X., Ullah N., et al. Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917. Journal of Food Science, 2015, 80 (10), E2217–27.
7. Shah N., Ul-Islam M., Khattak W.A., Park J.K. Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: A multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2013, 98, P. 1585–1598.
8. Nainggolan H., Gea S., et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of bacterial-cellulose-fibre-reinforced Mater-Bi bionanocomposite. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 2013, 4, P. 325–329.
9. Buyanov A.L., Gofman I.V., et al. Anisotropic swelling and mechanical behavior of composite bacterial cellulose-(polyacrylamide or polyacrylamide-sodium polyacrylate) hydrogels. Journal of the mechanical behaviour of biomedical materials, 2010, 3, P. 102–111.
10. Smyslov R.Yu., Ezdakova K.V.,et al. Morphological structure of Gluconacetobacter xylinus cellulose and cellulose-based organic-inorganic composite materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 848, P. 012017–012028.
11. Shah P., Pandey K. Advancement in packaging film using microcrystalline cellulose and TiO2. American Journal of Polymer Science and Technology, 2017, 3, P. 97–102.
12. Bouadjela S., Abdoune F.Z., et al. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on polymer network formation. Spectroscopy Letters, 2017, 50, P. 522–527.
13. Tamayo L., Azocar M., et al. Copper-polymer nanocomposites: An excellent and cost-effective biocide for use on antibacterial surfaces. Review. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2016, 69, P. 1391–1409.
14. Mallakpour S., Darvishzadeh M. Ultrasonic treatment as recent and environmentally friendly route for the synthesis and characterization of polymer nanocomposite having PVA and biosafe BSA modified ZnO nanoparticles. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2018, 29, P. 2174–2183.
15. Lu Z., Mao C., et al. Fabrication of CeO2 nanoparticle-modified silk for UV protection and antibacterial applications. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 435, P. 8–14.
16. Liu K.-Q., Kuang C.-X., et al. Synthesis, characterization and UV-shielding property of polystyrene-embedded CeO2 nanoparticles. Optical Materials, 2013, 35, P. 2710–2715.
17. Mullins D.R. The surface chemistry of cerium oxide. Surface Science Reports, 2015, 70, P. 42–85.
18. Tiefensee F., Becker-Willinger C., et al. Nanocomposite cerium oxide polymer matching layers with adjustable acoustic impedance between 4 MRayl and 7 MRayl. Ultrasonics, 2010, 50, P. 363–366.
19. Jia R.-P., Wang C.-F., et al. Preparation, characterization, and properties of CeO2/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2015, 34, P. 1090–1098.
20. Shang Z., Lu C., Lu X., Gao L. Studies on syntheses and properties of novel CeO2/polyimide nanocomposite films from Ce(Phen)3 complex. Polymer, 2007, 48, P. 4041–4046.
21. Buyanov A.L., Revel’skaya L.G., Kuznetzov Yu.P., Shestakova A.S. Cellulose-poly(acrylamide or acrylic acid) interpenetrating polymer membranes for the pervaporation of water-ethanol mixtures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1998, 69, P. 761–768.
22. Ivanov V.K., Polezhaeva O.S., et al. Synthesis and thermal stability of nanocrystalline ceria sols stabilized by citric and polyacrylic acids. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2010, 55 (3), P. 328–332.
23. Kriegner D., Matej Z., Kuzel R., Holy´ V. Powder diffraction in Bragg–Brentano geometry with straight linear detectors. J. Appl. Cryst., 2015, 48, P. 613–618.
24. Gofman I., Larin S., Liulin S., Falkovich S. The device for the determination of coefficient of sliding friction. Patent of Russian Federation No. 150882, Published 10.03.2015. Inventions. Useful models. 2015. No 7.
25. Mullins D.R. The surface chemistry of cerium oxide. Surface Science Reports, 2015, 70, P. 42–85.
26. Kannam S.K., Oehme D.P., et al. Hydrogen bonds and twist in cellulose microfibrils. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 175, P. 433–439.
27. Valenkov A.M., Gofman I.V., et al. Polymeric Composite Systems Modifi ed with Allotropic Forms of Carbon (Review). Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2011, 84 (5), P. 735–750.
28. Garboczi E.J., Snyder K.A., Douglas J.F., Thorpe M.F. Geometrical percolation threshold of overlapping ellipsoids. Phys. Review. E, 1995, 52 (1), P. 819–828.
29. Rajeshkumar S., Naik P. Synthesis and biomedical applications of Cerium oxide nanoparticles – A Review. Biotechnology Reports, 2018, 17, P. 1–5.
30. Popov A.L., Ermakov A.M., et al. Biosafety and effect of nanoparticles of CeO2 on metabolic and proliferative activity of human mesenchymal stem cells In Vitro. Int. J. Nanomech. Sci. Tech., 2016, 7, P. 165–175.
31. Aly A., Zeidan E., et al. Friction and Wear of Polymer Composites Filled by Nano-Particles: A Review. World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering, 2012, 2, P. 32–39.
32. Chamnipan R., Chutima S., Uthaisangsuk V. Processing and characterization of nano filler containing friction materials. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, 5, P. 9467–9475.
33. Shin C., Choi J., et al. Trace metals optimization in ceria abrasive for material removal rate enhancement during ILD CMP. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol., 2017, 6, P. 687–690.
34. Suda S. Nanocomposite glass abrasives. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 2014, 122, P. 244–249.
Review
For citations:
Gofman I.V., Nikolaeva A.L., Khripunov A.K., Yakimansky A.V., Ivan’kova E.M., Romanov D.P., Ivanova O.S., Teplonogova M.A., Ivanov V.K. Impact of nano-sized cerium oxide on physico-mechanical characteristics and thermal properties of the bacterial cellulose films. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics. 2018;9(6):754–762. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2018-9-6-754-762
Views:
2
Email this article 